Archive for January, 2016

ANGELIQUE – edition 2016

Posted by on Saturday, 30 January, 2016

SERENA si-a gãsit…nashul!

Courtesy: topnews.in

Desi ESPN – ne-a invitat la o ora extrem de inconfortabila ( 2.30 am ) pt. a urmari

finala feminina a  Openului Australian 2016 , m-am decis sa  renunt la confortul nocturn pt.

a lua parte ” in direct ” la o confruntare ce se anunta  tensionata , imprevizibila ,

savuroasa : Serena  vs  Angelique ! Si – desi cu o cafea alaturi , pt. mai multa… siguranta –

nu am regretat deloc. Spre deosebire de  pronosticurile profesioniste , eu le-am acordat celor

doua competitoare sanse sensibil egale : 50 % , fiind convins ca va invinge cea care va dori mai

aprig victoria. Si aceasta a fost , fara indoiala , ANGELIQUE KERBER!

Daca AK m-ar fi intrebat inainte de meci cum ar trebui sa abordeze partida pt. a castiga, sugestia

mea ar fi fost simpla , directa:

                           ” Vrei sa câstigi la Serena? PLIMB-O ! “

Sunt sigur ca – desi nu de la inceput! – Angelique a inteles acest  imperativ: daca ar fi continuat sa-i serveasca Serenei” mingi pe tavã “ pierdea cu sigurantã! De ce asa ? Fiindcã , in mod firesc , marea campioana americana nu mai are mobilitatea  de acum…zece ani ( si nici aceeasi  dorinta acerba de victorie ) in schimb si-a pastrat intacta arta  de a expedia ( inspirat si in forta )  mingi decisive. Am fost deosebit de impresionat de bucuria  autentica  cu care – in final – cele doua s-au imbratisat ! To note : Serena nu a asteptat ca Angelique sa vina la fileu pt. o imbratisare ” de serviciu ” ci a patruns  in  plin teritoriu …german  pt. a-si prezenta  felicitarile! Urmariti ( photo 2 ) naturaletea  zâmbetelor celor doua si imi veti da dreptate : dincolo de miza uriasa a partidei , de incrâncenãrile luptei  din teren,  ambele au etalat o surprinzatoare prospetime sufleteasca  pt. care  merita cu prisosinta stima si dragostea noastra.

In poza nr. 3 mi-am propus sa va prezint   valentele  ascunse  ale unei feminitati de exceptie  disimulata , de obicei,  sub masca inevitabila a crispãrii . In concluzie, decizia mea de a face o noapte alba  a fost rasplatita cu generozitate.

Bravo Angelique! Bravo Serena!

Cum imi stã in obicei, voi incheia  si de aceasta data postul meu cu o dedicatie  muzicala de exceptie :

piesa superba “ Victory – Andre RIEU & BOND “ in versiunea Drake Sparrow.

Courtesy: sports.ndtv.com

Courtesy : ENTERTAINMENTWALLPAPER.COM  

Romantism ( desuet? ) – 1930. Despartirile ca niste riduri…

Posted by on Friday, 29 January, 2016

               Acelei care a plecat

  (  poezie de Ion Pribeagu – 1930 ) cu un epilog “New Holism”

   Photo: divahair.ro

Când ai plecat, zâmbind, din casa noastră,
Din odăiţa plină de senin,
În grabă, ai uitat o floare-n glastră
Şi pijamaua ta de crèpe de chine.

Sărmana pijama cu flori bizare,
În care-ai râs atât, nici nu credea
Că va veni o zi amară-n care
Ai să ne uiţi, pe mine şi pe ea.

De-atunci, şedem în fiecare seară
În faţa sobei pline de cărbuni
Şi depănăm povestea iar şi iară,
Ca doi prieteni buni.

Ştiind c-atât de mult îţi fuse dragă,
O-mbrăţişez sub vraja din amurg,
Prin falduri îmi adorm privirea vagă
Şi-i mângai fiecare brandenburg.

Şi noaptea, prin apusuri cristaline,
Când dorul sparge-al lacrimilor dig,
O culc în pat alăturea de mine
Şi-o învelesc, ca să nu-i fie frig.

Publicat de Ioan NICA – Deva , Romania

Si acum, epilogul  evanstonian (…hiperoptimist ):

  Courtesy: perfectdevil131.wordpress.com

Einstein ( and conventional physics ) vs absolute individualization /actualization. How the actualization is attuned by the ether XXI

Posted by on Wednesday, 27 January, 2016

There is no such thing as an object in absolute isolation.

Every thing is interconnected and integrated

in all encompassing whole, which is the whole universe”.

Alfred KORZYBSKI [1]

Abstract

The XXI actualization / individuality – in broad, non-Cartesian sense- is attuned by the contribution of the entire Universe ( via the ether and absolute simultaneity) and not only by one collisional point on the screen nor a local and/or regional trajectory.

The present paper aims to be a contribution to the development of a new conceptual, non-Cartesian frame being primarily dedicated to the elaboration of a new category of physical absolute individuality.

Non-Cartesian perspective and new / in broad sense astrology

Other significant, correlative aspects are also covered :

the loss of fundamentality of some models/concepts/criteria traditionally formulated from the position of a local realism such as:

“either /or“ logic ( one important conceptual obstacle toward promotion of XXI continuity );

  • the abstract / metaphysical models of the ether in Einstein’s and Lorentz’s perspective (our opinion being that “ Back to Lorentz” urge of some contemporary authors is hard to accept being clearly counterproductive from the standpoint of authenticity XXI , see the Section 7 ).

Moreover, I have tried to answer some crucial questions that the great XX physicists have left them unsolved or partially solved such as:

  • what is really vibrating / propagating in Schrodinger equation?
  • when /where/ how is actualization of the events being produced ?
  • why the conclusions of the Eddington experiment from 1919 concerning “bending of light “ around the Sun cannot be extended tale-quale on space and time?
  • Heisenberg’s principle – why its loss of fundamentality is mainly due to the new, attuned individuality?
  • Why the simplistic combinations ( with or without some stipulative exclusions ) between space and time and especially between space and ether are methodologically unacceptable ?

*

Summary

1.The main effort of the XXI methodology: transition from “in itself” to “attuned” models

2. About the specific of transition from Cartesian to Non-Cartesian ( C / NC ) methodology.

Three revelations:

a. Einstein without a doubt was lacking a genuine ( Non-Cartesian ) Whole / Wholeness

b. The Einsteinian theoretical contribution to the physics XX – revolution or reform ?

c. The most important conceptual confusions of C / NC transition:

  • real vs potential fields: light and space ( time,…) do they have the same physical essence?
  • space vs ether; is the ether disappearing Mr. Cahill ?

3.Time or timing? Time is not timing , of course, but attention : this is just a partial , unsatisfactory truth . The new XXI temporality: from time – observable to time – beable. Time rather than the space is formative by changing the states’ probabilities through acceleration / deceleration.

4. Existential Dogma (ED). Our ethereal scheme of electron actualization. What is propagated in Schrodinger equation? Physical individuality as objective wave function against Einsteinian conventional ( “ one like many ” ) statistical approach.

5. Re-establishing the genuine inseparability = re-connection with the universe. Physics XXI and Asttrology. Non-Cartesian perspective and the genuine synchronicity: why the conventional concept “ synchronicity = “ a bridge between matter and mind “ is incompatible with contemporary methodology. The complexity revolution and attunement principle require a new / in broad sense astrology.

6. Many….methodological thanks ( revised version ). When / where / how an event becomes actual. The unique role of the unconventional existential couple vacuum / ether. About minors.

7. Ether and physical individuality in perspective XX / XXI : Einstein vs Lorentz . Back to Lorentz ?

8. Concluding remarks

—————————————————————————————————————————————————

Download the full article for $19.99 and after a successful Paypal transaction you will be emailed a download link good for 7 days.

Any questions email me at ffelecan@new-holism.com

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

S.O.S. Romanian Forest!

Posted by on Tuesday, 5 January, 2016

Un sat fãrã câini: Codrul Vlãsiei

Fiind bãiet pãduri cutreieram…                Courtesy:Miroslav Havko

DESTINY 2016: a generalized Brexit preface…

Posted by on Tuesday, 5 January, 2016