Einstein was right!
Comments of the week:
Ive been meaning to read this and just never acquired a chance. Its an issue that Im extremely interested in, I just started reading and Im glad I did. Youre a terrific blogger, one of the most effective that Ive seen. This blog definitely has some information on subject that I just wasnt aware of. Thanks for bringing this things to light.
Pretty insightful publish. Never believed that it was this simple after all. I had spent a superior deal of my time looking for someone to explain this subject clearly and you’re the only one that ever did that. Kudos to you! Keep it up
Dude, please tell me that youre going to create a lot more. I notice you havent written an additional weblog for a while (Im just catching up myself). Your weblog is just too important to become missed. Youve obtained so significantly to say, this kind of knowledge about this subject it would be a shame to see this blog disappear. The internet needs you, man!
December 17, 2010 at 11:13 am
Very interesting and helpful information in this article. Thanks a lot for posting. I like the way of your thinks and Im lookin’ forward.
My reply : Thanks guys for your special, moral support. Admin
The quantum mechanics in Bohr / Copenhagen version was / is essentially incomplete! I remind the reader the title of the article published in 1935 by Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen in Phys. Rev.: “Can Quantum Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?” The right and honest answer: “categorically – no!” comes with a delay of 75 years; it will be exposed in a provisional form in the following pages and in a more elaborated form in a future article suggestively entitled: “ The GENETICS of Quantum Mechanics – a surprising resolution of EPR paradox.”
Unfortunately being “blinded by real” neither Einstein or Bohm nor even Bell did identify / promote this “hidden variable” – key called “POTENTIAL IN-FORMATION” able to decisively reorganize the foundations of quantum mechanics and not arbitrarily but in a direction suggested by Einstein himself, involving the radical diminishing of quantum indeterminism assumed by Copenhagen interpretation. To mention that Bohm ( following de Broglie ) has tried to explain the 2sE ( double slit experiment ) in a more direct and simple way, limiting to only reals ( particles, wave ), in other words suggesting a scheme of type “real in-formation” that I do not consider contrary to “potential in-formation” model but only more traditional and scarcer in methodological resources: being centered on particles it is, amongst others, a lot less potent in explanation / promotion of non-locality, which – in my opinion – involves in a defining manner potentiality / potential waves; also the anti-stochastic contribution of potential waves is net superior to any real type of adjustments / corrections.
Together with our small methodological team, spontaneously constituted around me, we are happy to announce that the first convincing demonstration regarding the principial incompleteness of quantum mechanics has taken place in Evanston – USA, through substantiation of the first rate role probably played by the anti-stochastic factors such as potential in-formation in 2sE and, through extension, in organizing of the electronic shells of atoms ( see Fig.2 bellow ), superconductivity, quantum tunneling, healing and…much more. At the same time the mentioned factors have an essential contribution (this time Einstein being caught on the wrong foot) in promoting of quantum non-locality: indeed it seems that potential in-formation ( P In ) is able to completely shatter both undeterminist prejudices as well as locality.
Fig.2 The ” hidden variable” ( P In ) at work: the principal quantum numbers, the structure and stability of the atomic electronic shell, quantum tunneling, healing / regeneration of compromised tissues and much more may derive from…2sE
Thus, with or against Einstein, the contemporary development of quantum mechanics may be accomplished under the sign of:
- negation of the (assumed) intrinsic indeterminism;
- centering the quantum process on hidden / uncontrolable variables of a potential nature;
- promotion of non-locality beyond any realist – local limits, artificially established by the special theory of relativity;
- recognizing a new and genuine principle of complementarity according to which continuity / discontinuity and waviness / non-waviness are not antinomic characteristics, nor reciprocal exclusive features (according to the simplistic, erroneous conception of N. Bohr which, as any binary/ Hegelian construction,does not allow transitions / overlapping ), nor being logically equipotent, the preeminence of continuum respectively of the waves / waviness being generally recognized. To note that the new complementarity is extensively exposed on this blog in section “ Synthesis with Harmonizator”.
The main methodological conclusion derived from 2sE is : the contemporary scientific knowledge has entered a creative, originary zone in which potentiality can manifest itself becoming effective even though not necessarily perceptible.