Interviuri Madrilene ( 3 ): Pasteur or Bechamp ? WISE after the event!

This entry was posted by on Saturday, 12 June, 2010 at
Mic …Manual de  Intelepciune Contemporana

Comment of the week:

 

  • I was just seeking this information for some time. After 6 hours of continuous Googleing, finally I got it in your web site. I wonder what’s the lack of Google strategy that do not rank this kind of informative sites in top of the list. Usually the top web sites are full of garbage.

 

Murtagh962321@earthlink.net
108.62.155.43

Youre so right. Im there with you. Your blog is definitely worth a read if anyone comes across it. Im lucky I did because now Ive acquired a whole new view of this. I didnt realise that this issue was so important and so universal. You unquestionably put it in perspective for me.

Dubeau103@gmail.com
109.230.220.215

Advantageously, the article is in reality the greatest on this notable topic. I fit in together with your conclusions and can thirstily anticipate to your upcoming updates. just saying thanks won’t just be adequate, for the tremendous lucidity in your writing. i will be able to instantly grab your rss feed to stay abreast of any updates. Gratifying work and far success in your business eff


Lena , de ce crezi ca o anume persoana , absolventul unui colegiu sa zicem , ar citi pana la capat Interviul nostru “ 3 “ dedicat intelepciunii ? Crezi in adevar ca un plus de intelepciune ( metodologie non-cartesiana , integrativa = managementul optim al intregului ) poate juca un rol decisiv  in balanta succesului cotidian ( aflat clar sub semnul metodologiei cartesiene = manipularea  relatiei parte / intreg ) ? Iata, ne cunoastem de circa o luna de zile, te-ai ales cu ceva din aceasta contaminare cu viziunea integrativa a unei persoane despre care cu 5 saptamani in urma nu stiai absolut nimic ?

M.- Stop, Florin . Prea multe intrebari ma deruteaza. Cu toate ca  n-o sa-ti raspund punctual ci…global. Noi toti – cu sau fara colegii – avem nevoie de integralitatea intelepciunii  pentru a intelege adecvat, global lumea din jur ( mult mai extinsa, mai complexa si mai dinamica decat cea traditionala) si de fiecare data cand am incheiat lectura unui articol de pe siteul nostru ( de acum e al nostru, nu-i asa? ) m-am simtit mai bogata la un nivel as zice esential, ca si cum  cineva mi-ar fi  deschis usi si ferestre conceptuale nebanuite -sau aproape- prin care un aer cognitiv proaspat a dat navala facandu-ma pur si simplu sa…chicotesc de satisfactie.Doar un exemplu: conceptul de nelinearitate , pe care eu il receptasem exclusiv geometric , ca pe o ramificatie si atat, m-a ajutat sa-mi redefinesc epoca, cu noile ei promisiuni si riscuri, cu care nu te mai poti juca fiindca …bifurcatia sta la panda si te poate taxa in mod dur si mai ales ireversibil. Sunt absolut sigura ca lectorul nostru de azi nu se va opri cu lectura la jumatate fiindca imbogatirea dramatica de care vorbeam nu e deloc o iluzie! Eu te-as intreba mai curand de unde iti iei tu indrazneala inepuizabila, uneori nebuna – ca in cazul detasarii de Heidegger si Prigogine / Hegel – de a aborda problemele atat de dramatic si totusi firesc de parca ai sti dinainte ca rezultatul trebuie sa fie unul pozitiv? Cine iti arata drumul- lungimea , largimea, sinuozitatile dar mai ales adancimea acestui traiect conceptual “ de autor “?

F.- Sunt de acord cu tine : privita din afara “ obraznicia” mea metodologica ( pe care am avut-o cred dintotdeauna , inclusiv din timpul liceului, dar mai cu seama din facultate cand petreceam ore si zile intregi la Biblioteca Academiei sau cea universitara citind autori first class, nu doar straini! ) poate parea oarecum…misterioasa. In realitate nu e niciun mister : am avut totdeauna cultul si perceptia clara a noului semnificativ: citindu-i pe Prigogine , Heidegger , Bohm,  Blaga, Noica simteam ca se schimba ca prin minune peisajul conceptual uzual si eu odata cu el ( la unele cursuri universitare ca sa rezist citeam gazeta Sportul, pe furis , in schimb in orele de biblioteca doar vederea Sportului la unii colegi ma scotea din sarite ). Cateva “ secrete” exista totusi si, in continuare, ma voi referi la ele fara nicio retinere. De pilda, in elaborarea sistematica a “ categoriilor in sens larg “ am fost ajutat de un indicator extraordinar de directie made in China =TAO ( care-mi arata cam ca Steaua polara (deci nu in detaliu! ) incotro trebuie sa o iau: urmeaza natura! ) si de cativa indicatori de detaliu ( indicatori numiti de mine  “ target”, de tip busola ): Thomas Kuhn, lucrarea lui de prin anii 6o “ Structura revolutiilor stiintifice “ , in mod special conceptul kuhnian “ paradigm shift “ precum si filosoful suedez Peter Gardenfors cu lucrarile lui dedicate structurii ( reprezentationale ) a conceptelor , oferind, in mod deosebit, un framework- pilot pt. elaborarea …framework-ului integrativ atat de necesar cercetarii stiintifice contemporane . Pe Peter l-am urmarit pe viu ,cu mult interes in 1987 la Universitatea Lomonosov – Moscova, prezentandu-si comunicarea despre spatii conceptuale; la iesire , pe Colina Universitatii , in asteptarea autobuzului eram numai noi doi si…vantul moscovit, deloc protocolar. As fi vrut sa-l interpelez dar am ezitat, ne-am privit doar reciproc – el era intr-un trench alb , rascolit de vant – si atat. Azi imi explic retinerea mea prin faptul ca, pe atunci, operatia de restructurare categoriala pe care o derulez in prezent sistematic pe site-ul nostru era mai curand  intr-o faza de proiect ( publicasem doar “ Finalitatea in sens largextinzand conceptul si asupra sistemelor inorganice, aflate in situatia physis. Aici as vrea sa zabovesc un moment  asupra unui aspect metodologic deosebit de semnificativ mai ales pt. cercetatorii tineri: cum se poate iesi din mecanicism ?– mentionez ca  Scoala de la Copenhaga, cu toate inovatiile ei  oprite cam la jumatate, era/este inca  imbibata de  sevele mecanicismului , mai ales la nivel de intregi / totalitati; la  intrebarea – cheie formulata mai sus,  raspunsurile  autorilor de referinta difera in mod  esential: Whitehead a raspuns : prin organism ( abordare organismica ); Bohm -ramanand in fizica: prin holografie, Prigogine ( si Scoala Belgiana de termodinamica ): prin departarea de echilibru, etc., Heidegger ( si Scoala Daneza de filosofie ): prin  ramanerea in posibil,…ei bine, optiunea mea reprezinta o emergenta a tuturor acestor pozitii partiale : prin  SITUATIA PHYSIS Daca Peter ia cumva cunostinta de acest site, m-as bucura sa afle  ca de fapt este indiscutabil co-autor la serialul “ categoriile in sens larg”! Decizia mea de a ma dedica elaborarii  unor categorii noi, “generalizate” a avut la baza o alta detasare critica , in cazul acesta distantandu-ma ferm de un fizician – filosof cu totul remarcabil, l-am numit pe Werner  Heisenberg, care afirmase ( aproape convingator ) ca  atitudinea de modernizare cea mai indicata fata de  mecanica clasica ( si, corelativ, fata de  metafizica traditionala ) ar fi nu una de tip generalizare ( prin introducerea unor categorii noi ” in sens larg” ) ci una  de re-interpretare ( Umdeutung ). Punctul meu de vedere a fost – si a ramas –  diametral opus  si iata de ce:  daca ne-am limita  – cf. lui Heisenberg – doar la o re-interpretare a  conceptelor vechi atunci am promova o relatie logica  de…vasalitate intre vechi si nou, vechiul beneficiind de un statut  de permanenta si chiar fundamentalitate fata de nou! ( un bun exemplu il constituie  raportul  dintre macroscopic ( vechiul )  si…re-interpretarea lui = lumea cuantica ( quasi-inexistenta! ) in viziunea Scolii Copenhaga ).  Alegand solutia ” curajoasa” a  generalizarii, lucrurile se modifica radical :  prin generalizare ( care , incontestabil,  contine si elemente de tip Umdeutung ! )  semnificatia conceptuala  primara – de o   insemnatate  deopotriva  istorica  si practica –  isi pierde  fundamentalitatea devenind  o prima aproximatie, avand deci  o validitate derivata, locala. Dupa cum stii, in prezent lucrez  la un ” rethink ” de mare interes metodologic vizand chiar ...principiul lui Heisenberg ( relatiile  de incertitudine ) si pot sa precizez ca nu voi face aceasta reconsiderare  de pe pozitiile tipice ale unei re-interpretari… diplomatice ci voi incerca sa demonstrez ca acest principiu aparent infailibil apare tot mai ingust, devenind adesea irelevant,nefundamental. Am facut desigur uz si aici de metoda / schema  mea cu cei doi indicatori distincti: indicatorul de directie fiind  David BOHM – mai exact, lucrarea lui despre ” Wholeness ..” care mi-a furnizat frame-ul conceptual non-Heisenberg (  axat pe totalitati si nelocalitate dar, din pacate …nu si pe unde / waves ) in vreme ce indicatorii- target au fost alti doi mari fizicieni- filosofi :  Erwin SCHRÖDINGER si Hans – Dieter ZEH ( dedicati in mod neconditionat continuitatii ondulatorii  ) precum si un remarcabil coleg roman , fizicianul – Dr. Spiridon DUMITRU-Universitatea ” Transilvania ” – Brasov. Anticipand, voi arata ca pe bazele amintite  am introdus ( intr-un articol publicat la sfarsitul  anilor ’80 ! ) o distinctie- cheie intre doua forme de cunoastere: cunoasterea-  actiune ( care la micro-nivel  si numai acolo poate fi numita ” cunoastere Heisenberg” ) si cunoasterea – comunicare care fie nu perturba starea  ( cuantica ) a sistemului, fie se limiteaza la perturbari irelevante la nivelul totalitatii; analiza mea metodologica nu se va limita , bineinteles, la orizontul epistemologic.
M.– Cat de generala este utilizarea acestei scheme cu indicatori de directie si target ?

F.– Oricum ea constituie mai curand regula decat exceptia. Spre exemplu in cazul elaborarii lui Dasein in sens larg, indicatorul de directie a fost Scoala Daneza de filosofie ( Kierkegaard , Hoffding ) care a afirmat in mod repetat ca fiinta / fiintarea autentica este conditionata de ramanerea in posibil, ceea ce-i asigura fiintei abilitatea de a alege ; indicatorul target a fost in acest caz fizicianul rus Umov, care a statuat  prin 1900 rolul fundamental al alegerii / selectiei intr-o fizica a viitorului. Dupa constatarea mea, literalmente curajoasa ca practic toti fizicienii contemporani nu au ramas in posibil ( inclusiv  V.A.Fock care dupa ce afirmase candva – extrem de promitator pt. mine –  necesitatea reabilitarii posibilului  in raport cu  realul, ulterior s-a limitat la concretizari facil – secventiale de tipul …prognoza / fapt, omitand coexistenta inalienabila  dintre posibil ↔ real  ) nu am avut  altceva mai bun de facut decat …sa ma obraznicesc, subliniind de cate ori am avut ocazia  ca absolut in toate cazurile teoretizate  de catre realisti sub semnul FAPP, ceva exista inainte de a fi dat.

M.– Si ai facut-o fara ezitare!

F.– Sansa mea . In mod deosebit pentru cercetatorii tineri, dornici de afirmare , vreau sa subliniez necesitatea imperioasa a detasarii de clasici ( evident , dupa o asimilare acurata , fara graba a operei acestora ), pericolul mare – intalnit frecvent in cazul lui Noica, dar si la ” Heidegger” si ” Bohr/ Born / Heisenberg”  – fiind “ incremenirea in concept “, vreau sa zic asimilezi autorul in detaliu, dar il plasezi intr-un insectar de idei, in conditii sterile, lasandu-l fara viata, intangibil, sacrosanct,  fara metabole ( exact ceea ce ii reprosa Heidegger metafizicii clasice ), permitandu-ti doar aplicatii prudent -ilustrative  sau comentarii “ rafinate”, aparent savante dar care in fond nu intereseaza pe nimeni cu adevarat: mai bine citesti…Sportul, cel putin acolo e viata, lupta vie si nu o …orto- bazaconie , vorba unui fizician competent si onest – Prof. Dr. Gheorghe  Stratan .

M.– As dori sa elaboram putin in legatura cu “ incremenirea in conceptul “ timp.Aparent, dupa anexarea timpului la spatiu ( si a spatiului la materie ), datorata lui Einstein, nu mai era nimic de facut in fizica timpului decat sa masori duratele cartesiene cu o exactitate …paranoica. Cine ti-a sugerat drumul spre “ timpul in sens larg” ? In orice caz nu St. Hawking..

F.- Nu. Hawking – care este totusi unul dintre cei mai  mari fizicieni in viata – urmandu-l pe Einstein , ingroapa timpul, invitandu-ne la… funeralii temporale savante; pt. mine insa timpul a reprezentat dintotdeauna ceva foarte viu, esential pt. viata , pt. oamenii – flacara ( spre deosebire de oamenii-fum ).

In fizica de azi, contemporana , avem de fapt 2 fizici : una ergonica ( centrata pe energie , localizare , separabilitate si… relativitate einsteiniana ) si o alta fizica  neergonica, nelocala in care timpul “ cuminte “ is out of joints! Daca lucrurile stau in adevar asfel avem nevoie de 2 concepte de timp- un timp einsteinian si unul non-einsteinian = fundamental,  cu suportul lor fizic distinct dar inseparabil: real / potential. Cand Einstein se referea la Luna de pe cer care s-ar afla acolo indiferent daca este privita / masurata de un observator uman sau nu , el de fapt confunda ( eu cred ca deliberat, era prea bun fizician sa nu –si dea seama de confuzie! ) cele 2 fizici – cea locala si cea nelocala. David Bohm ( in imagine ) spunea ceva , undeva despre dorinta lui de a reintroduce timpul in fizica , un timp nou, viu, ne-parametric. NU a facut nimic concret in acest sens ( el ramanand doar un rebel din pdv metodologic , dar ce rebel ! ), ei bine , am incercat eu sa afirm  ca timpul are o natura duala, constructiv / destructiva , solidara cu agresiunea subtila dar implacabila a potentialului-posibil asupra realului, curbura t a timpului fiind data de valoarea locala a Ip / Ir : cand p excede r avem a face cu o actiune demolatoare, destructiv/ disolutiva , in vreme ce actiunea generativ/structuranta se manifesta cand r incepe sa devina  precumpanitor ; situatia p = r ar corespunde unei steady state. De notat ca , in conformitate cu logica noua de tip “ both / and “ ( in traducere : “ si / si “ ) cele 2 tipuri de temporalitate, respectiv cele 2 fizici, nu se exclud una pe cealalta, localul fiind doar un caz particular al nelocalului. De aici si pana la detasarea mea – temporala – fata de Heidegger nu a mai fost decat un pas.

M.- Eu am sincer convingerea ca punand in lucru aceste “ secrete “ integrative se pot rezolva , la un anumit nivel , nu tehnic ci metodologic, orice probleme dificile ale cunoasterii contemporane. De exemplu am discutat indelung ( pe durata a 5 cafele! ) impreuna despre disputa Pasteur / Bechamp ( Bernard ) despre rolul tot mai contestat al Germ theory si, corelativ, al  vaccinarii in societatea actuala. Cum poate fi explicata la modul intelept aceasta disputa , despre care , pe patul de moarte , Pasteur a concluzionat – poate generos dar oricum  neconvingator pt. mine si altii – ca… Bechamp avusese dreptate – mediul interior si nu microbul fiind de fapt factorul decisiv ?

F.– Voi aborda, in incheiere ( punand in lucru pt. prima data insusi conceptul viu / autentic / intelept de complementaritate , elaborat de mine anterior, vezi Sinteza cu Armonizator, pe acest blog ) aceasta celebra disputa  de pe pozitia armonizarii urmand ca pe viitor sa ne ocupam in detaliu de problema extrem de interesanta a legitimitatii metodologice a vaccinarii ca si a utilizarii antibioticelor. Vreau sa arat ca Pasteur a gresit de 2 ori privind raportul dintre microbi / mediu : prima data in timpul vietii cand a afirmat prioritatea cauzala  absoluta in patogeneza  a microbilor exogeni in raport cu mediul intern si , ulterior , pe patul de moarte cand si-a recunoscut prima greseala … comitand-o pe cea de a doua. Nerezolvarea satisfacatoare a acestei dispute de mare interes teoretic si practic , poate fi explicata prin faptul ca a fost tot timpul abordata in chip neintelept , exclusiv pe baza unei logici traditionale de tip Cartesian : either / or , promovand disjunctia exclusiva ( ori / ori ) ; un alt  exemplu, foarte asemanator, de promovare a ...neintelepciunii il intalnim in elaborarea   artificiala , fara comunicare intre  distincte,  a complementaritatii lui Bohr.  Noi doi, in discutia celor …5 cafele, am pornit de la cu totul alte premise decat Bohr et comp  si anume de la o logica sintetica, de tip nou = ” both / and ” mult mai generoasa  si de la echilibrele dinamice  p / a si  a/ r distincte dar inseparabile:
potentializare  ↔ actualizare    si  actualizare ↔ realizare
Astazi, rolul exterioritatii in mecanismul patogenezei nu poate fi negat : alimentele , chiar cele organice, vin masiv contaminate bio – fizico – chimic ( gandeste-te doar o clipa la absurditatea situatiei curente de a livra lapte organic sau apa de izvor in…recipienti de plastic, de a servi  cafea  fierbinte in pahare garantat …toxice sau, last not least, de a furniza sistematic si deliberat ( ! )  pe piata alimentara publica a carnii de pasare, etc. continand hormoni de crestere sau chiar superbugs ( gata selectionati! ) pe care nici cele mai performante antibiotice aflate in uz nu-i mai pot controla in mod eficient ); apoi nu poate fi omis riscul crescand care revine poluarii electromagnetice, medicamentoase, etc. Rezulta ca potentialitatea / actualizarea ii dadea 100 % dreptate lui Pasteur sa afirme nu caracterul absolut ci  prioritatea ( cel putin temporala ) a factorilor exogeni in instalarea bolilor. In adevar boala inclusiv cancerul , Alzheimer, etc.- exista in mod inevitabil la nivel microscopic,  intr-o forma potential – actualizata,  in fiecare dintre noi. Mentinerea intr-o stare dorminda ( latenta ) a bolii depinde insa de activitatea factorului  intern : mediul  ( adica, in principal, sistemul imun dar si aciditatea stomacala! ) determina daca aceasta premisa p/a se realizeaza sau nu . Aici avem insa de considerat  celalalt echilibru dinamic si anume a / r:
actualizare  ↔ realizare

Pentru a atinge realizarea ( dimensiunea macroscopica ), actualizarea ( dimensiunea microscopica ) are nevoie de doua conditii sine qua non : amplificare si stabilizare la nivel macroscopic. Ambele sunt “ asigurate “ de un sistem imun compromis, de un mediu intern saturat de / in toxine , de un organism subminat de stresul intens, permanent.

Pt. cei  interesati de schema conceptual-metodologica  prezentata   mai sus ,  ofer in continuare un scurt dar extrem de relevant pasaj din cartea de author a lui Mike ANDERSON  intitulata “ Healing cancer  from the inside out “ ( 2008 ) cu convingerea ca orice cititor de buna credinta va  recunoaste – cu satisfactie -cum   contributia  complementara  ( si nu opozitia, cum se afirma curent ) a abordarilor  Pasteur si  Bechamp  face posibila  atat  intelegerea cat  si controlul  eficient al  cancerului printr-o dieta specifica ( “ RAVE “ ):

” You can’t prevent cancer.You are going to get cancer cells in your body. The average adult gets at least one cancer cell in their body every single day. And there ‘s nothing  you can do to prevent  that from  happening . The question is not whether you get cancer but whether your immune system  is healthy enough to kill cancer cells and stop them  from multiplying. “

In concluzie , nu se poate vorbi despre “ dreptatea lui Pasteur “ sau “ dreptatea lui Bechamp / Bernard ”, solutia corecta a problemei patogenezei fiind una global- integrativa, anume  ca ambele parti au surprins aspecte –cheie , care nu sunt reciproc exclusive ci complementare. In alti termeni,  in aria echilibrelor dinamice de tip p / a Pasteur este  fara nicio indoiala ” acasa ” ,  dar in domeniul  a / r , distinct metodologic, cei care fac legea sunt Bechamp si Bernard. Voi incheia reiterand intrebarea ta: nu este oare extrem de actuala si semnificativa  statuarea cu intelepciune , intr-un context metodologic  corect si cuprinzator, nealterat de considerente  financiare sau de alta natura , care este locul / rolul  real al vaccinarii in aceasta problematica  subtila  ( ” Pasteur or Bechamp? “) de  interes vital pt. toti contemporanii nostri – medici , pacienti, parinti?

194 Responses to “Interviuri Madrilene ( 3 ): Pasteur or Bechamp ? WISE after the event!”

  1. games

    I was recommended this web site by my cousin. I am not sure whether this post is written by him as nobody else know such detailed about my difficulty. You’re incredible! Thanks!

  2. Warner

    Simply wanna remark that you have a very nice internet site , I love the style it really stands out.

  3. zoe

    Keep working ,great job!

  4. Brendan Duross

    As soon as I detected this site I went on reddit to share some of the love with them.

  5. review melbourne

    Congratulations on having 1 of the most sophisticated blogs Ive come across in some time! Its just incredible how very much you can take away from one thing simply because of how visually beautiful it’s. Youve put together a excellent weblog space –great graphics, videos, layout. This is absolutely a must-see weblog!

  6. Lacy Soltren

    Thanks for another informative website. Where else could I get that kind of info written in such a perfect way? I’ve a project that I am just now working on, and I have been on the look out for such information.

  7. nba

    Fairly insightful submit. Never thought that it was this simple after all. I had spent a beneficial deal of my time looking for someone to explain this topic clearly and you’re the only 1 that ever did that. Kudos to you! Keep it up

  8. Howdy! Someone in my Facebook group shared this website with us so I came to look it over. I’m definitely loving the information. I’m bookmarking and will be tweeting this to my followers! Fantastic blog and outstanding design.

  9. I like the valuable info you provide in your articles. I will share your blog as Interviuri Madrilene ( 3 ): Pasteur or Bechamp ? WISE after the event! @ New Holism and check again here frequently. I’m quite certain I’ll learn plenty of new stuff right here! Best of luck for the next! 😉

  10. Rygestop

    Hello i found your blog on Yahoo! and i found it interesting to read. I bookmarked it for further reading. Thank you for sharing. Hopefully this will help me quit smoking

  11. Kanis

    This web site is my inhalation , very superb design and style and perfect written content .

  12. Lucy Fill

    Thanks for posting this article. I am definitely tired of struggling to find relevant and intelligent commentary on this subject. Everyone nowadays goes to the very far extremes to either drive home their viewpoint of that everybody else in the globe is wrong. Thanks for your consise and relevant insight.

  13. Keep posting stuff like this i really like it! Good job friend!

  14. solar

    I discovered your blog site on google and test a few of your early posts. Continue to maintain up the very good operate. I just additional up your RSS feed to my MSN Information Reader. In search of forward to reading more from you later on!…

  15. alfred

    I prize your time invested in this content , too bad it took me this long to find it but because they enunciate a quality is hard to find. Keep it up.

  16. Great way of putting it.

  17. Hi, I must say that Interviuri Madrilene ( 3 ): Pasteur or Bechamp ? WISE after the event! @ New Holism is really a quite great location to slack from work 🙂 I really love your weblog and I have currently bookmarked it. Please, keep it updated far more frequently. Thanks!

  18. samples

    We still can not quite believe I could end up being one of those studying the important recommendations found on your site. My family and I are seriously thankful for your generosity and for giving me the chance to pursue this chosen career path. Thank you for the important information I acquired from your web-site.

  19. nutrition

    Thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love learning more on this topic. If possible, as you gain expertise, would you mind updating your blog with more information? It is extremely helpful for me.

  20. Hello! I thought I would send a fast remark considering that I’ve spent the higher a part of the previous half-hour scanning through your weblog posts. I am really liking what you’ve received happening right here together with your weblog and I do hope you keep writing it. Nicely that is just about all I have to say! Many thanks and very nice to virtually ‘meet’ you and your website.

  21. There are some attention-grabbing cut-off dates in this article but I don’t know if I see all of them center to heart. There may be some validity but I’ll take hold opinion until I look into it further. Good article , thanks and we would like more! Added to FeedBurner as well

  22. Hi there, just became alert to your blog through Google, and found that it’s truly informative. I’m going to watch out for brussels. I’ll appreciate if you continue this in future. Numerous people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  23. Najlepsze Gry

    Outstanding piece, thanks for sharing!

  24. I like this . Do you have a stumbleupon address of you to follow? I will bookmark you. Please msg me.

  25. Blackjack internetowy

    That’s incredible!

  26. Internetowe kasyna gry

    Great read. I also think it could be a bit longer 😉

  27. Anonymous

    Took me time to read all the comments, but I really enjoyed the article. It proved to be Very helpful to me and I am sure to all the commenters here! It’s always nice when you can not only be informed, but also entertained!

  28. Norah Roberg

    Love the blog, I’ve listened to datsik like 25 times today. Keep up the blog man!

  29. I do agree with all of the ideas you have presented in your post. They’re really convincing and will certainly work. Still, the posts are very short for starters. Could you please extend them a bit from next time? Thanks for the post.

  30. I wish to exchange website linksinks with you. Should you be thinking about exchanging website links with me,please send me a email

  31. Just a smiling visitor here to share the love (:, btw outstanding style .

  32. led lights

    great

  33. Zakłady

    Thanks so much for this information … I’m already doing some of these suggestions but there are many others that are new to me.

  34. Thank you for an additional essential article. The place else may anyone get that form of info in such an entire method of writing? I have a presentation incoming week, and I am on the lookout for such information.

  35. Iltin

    Thanks for the post 🙂

  36. Bookmarked 🙂

    Could I use parts of that article for my own Blog?
    I would backlink you of course (:

    best wishes from Germany!
    Yes, you ( and ANYONE else ) can use my article(s) just indicating carefully the source.
    Best wishes from Evanston , USA. Admin

  37. Thanks for the info! I hope you post more stuff like this. I always get hyped for Starcraft 2.

  38. you might have an excellent blog here! would you wish to make some invite posts on my weblog?

  39. pop

    You really make it seem so easy with your presentation but I’ve found this topic to be actually something which I believe I would never understand.

  40. Can I just say what a relief to search out somebody who truly knows what theyre speaking about on the internet. You definitely know methods to carry an issue to gentle and make it important. More people need to read this and perceive this aspect of the story. I cant believe youre no more common since you positively have the gift.

  41. Ive been meaning to read this and just never acquired a chance. Its an issue that Im very interested in, I just started reading and Im glad I did. Youre a terrific blogger, 1 of the most effective that Ive seen. This weblog surely has some information on subject that I just wasnt aware of. Thanks for bringing this things to light.

  42. treatment

    Hi, Neat post. There is a problem with your web site in internet explorer, would test this… IE still is the market leader and a large portion of people will miss your fantastic writing due to this problem.

  43. Thanks for writing about this. I wrote about this on my Web site as i thought it was interesting.

  44. Briedoromiutt

    Hi, my english isnt the top but I imagine by regulary visits of one’s blog it is going to be better inside next time. You have a excellent wrting style that is simple to understand and can aids persons like me to learn english. I will be now a regulary visitor of your blog.

  45. games

    hi, thank you your writing way is superb. solely set up your site upon bing. happen fullback subsequently because of undeniable 🙂

  46. Francis

    Needed to put you a bit of word to help thank you once again for all the exceptional secrets you’ve discussed at this time. It is really unbelievably generous of you in giving unhampered precisely what some people could have made available as an e book to end up making some cash for their own end, certainly now that you might well have done it in the event you wanted. Those techniques in addition served as the good way to know that someone else have similar zeal the same as my own to figure out whole lot more around this problem. I’m sure there are several more pleasant instances in the future for those who looked over your blog. Low Self Esteem Symptoms

  47. Some really nice and useful info on this site, besides I think the style and design holds excellent features.

  48. i am to see you that you try your best to give information.keep it up!!!

  49. Oh my goodness! a tremendous article dude. Thanks Nonetheless I am experiencing problem with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody getting equivalent rss downside? Anybody who knows kindly respond. Thnkx

  50. lights

    My associate and I actually loved studying this blog submit, I was just itching to know do you commerce featured posts? I’m always looking for someone to make trades with and merely thought I might ask.


Leave a Reply